Should Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physicians Staff Labor Floors? Or: Obstetricians We Were, Obstetricians We Are, and Obstetricians We Should Be

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · Published 2026-08-10 · Journal article · DOI 10.1097/grf.0000000000001052

Authors (1)

Steven J. Ralston

Abstract

PubPorta does not have an abstract for this article yet.

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year

2026

Citation

Ralston, S. (2026). Should Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physicians Staff Labor Floors? Or: Obstetricians We Were, Obstetricians We Are, and Obstetricians We Should Be. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000001052

Related articles

• Routine Hospitalization for Vasa Previa in the Third Trimester: Evidence Review and Clinical Implications · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• Anesthetic and Analgesic Considerations in Pregnant Patients With Cardiac Disease · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• Against · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• Beyond the Basics: Cutting-Edge Approaches to Chronic Pelvic Pain Evaluation · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• When Experts Disagree: Contemporary Controversies in Maternal-Fetal Medicine · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• Index · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• Contraceptive Counseling and Options in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
• From Cramps to Chronicity: Rethinking Dysmenorrhea on the Spectrum of Chronic Pelvic Pain · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025 · Same journal
• Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal