Against

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · Published 2026-08-25 · Journal article · DOI 10.1097/grf.0000000000001054

Authors (4)

Madeleine P. Kendall, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Yinka Oyelese, Daniel L. Rolnik

Abstract

PubPorta does not have an abstract for this article yet.

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year: 2026

Citation

Kendall, M., Costa, F., Oyelese, Y., et al. (2026). Against. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000001054

Related articles

Routine Hospitalization for Vasa Previa in the Third Trimester: Evidence Review and Clinical Implications · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
Anesthetic and Analgesic Considerations in Pregnant Patients With Cardiac Disease · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
Beyond the Basics: Cutting-Edge Approaches to Chronic Pelvic Pain Evaluation · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
When Experts Disagree: Contemporary Controversies in Maternal-Fetal Medicine · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
Index · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
Contraceptive Counseling and Options in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
From Cramps to Chronicity: Rethinking Dysmenorrhea on the Spectrum of Chronic Pelvic Pain · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025 · Same journal
Should Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physicians Staff Labor Floors? Or: Obstetricians We Were, Obstetricians We Are, and Obstetricians We Should Be · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal
Argument in Favor of Reporting Adult-onset Conditions in Prenatal Diagnosis · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026 · Same journal