Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for the pregnancy rate after tubal anastomosis in women with tubal ligation
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · Published 2025-05-23 · DOI 10.1016/j.lers.2025.05.001
Free full text
Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2025.05.001
Abstract
Objective: Female sterilization is a common contraceptive method, but with changing family dynamics, an increasing number of women seek to restore fertility after tubal sterilization. Current clinical practice lacks effective tools for predicting pregnancy rates in this population after tubal anastomosis. This study aims to develop and internally validate a novel nomogram for predicting the pregnancy rate in women with tubal ligation after tubal anastomosis. Methods: We developed a prediction model based on a training dataset of 208 patients with tubal ligation after undergoing tubal anastomosis between January 2012 and August 2020 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The follow-up period for all patients was one year postsurgery, during which pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The LASSO regression model was used to optimize feature selection for the pregnancy rate risk model. The performance of the nomogram was assessed for its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Internal validation was assessed. Results: Predictors included in the prediction nomogram were age, type of anastomosis, sterilization duration, time of conception, and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. The model displayed good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.876–0.971), and good calibration. A high C-index value of 0.879 was still reached in the interval validation. Decision curve analysis revealed that the pregnancy rate nomogram was clinically useful when intervention was selected at the pregnancy rate possibility threshold of 1%. Conclusion: This novel pregnancy rate nomogram incorporating age, type of anastomosis, sterilization duration, time of conception, and AMH could be conveniently used to predict the pregnancy rate in women with tubal ligation after tubal anastomosis.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →
Publication details
- Year
- 2025
Related articles
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2026 · Cites or is cited by this article · Same journal
- Combining traditional laparoscopic box practice with video gaming: A randomized control trial · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2025 · Same journal
- Recent patterns in minimally invasive colectomies: Where are we now? · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2024 · Same journal
- Revised in-depth meta-analysis on the efficacy of robot-assisted versus traditional free-hand pedicle screw insertion · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2024 · Same journal
- Mesenteric teratoma of the small bowel: A rare entity in abdominal surgery · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
- Helicobacter pylori infection may result in poor gastric cleanliness in magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy examination: A single-center retrospective study · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2024 · Same journal
- The outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease post bariatric surgery: A systemic review and meta-analysis · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2025 · Same journal
- Clinical review of robotic distal pancreatectomy · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2025 · Same journal
- From forceps manipulation theory to cognitive support in robotic surgery: Conceptualizing “Level 0+” as a cognitive-support state in fully surgeon-controlled surgery · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
- Reducing surgeon musculoskeletal discomfort through ergonomic optimization in robotic surgery: A quality improvement evaluation · Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery · 2026 · Same journal