Tomography · Published 2026-04-01 · DOI 10.3390/tomography12040049
Background/Objectives: Modern tomographic reconstruction methods—including physics-informed and AI-based approaches—can produce very high fidelity images. In this regime, widely used global image quality metrics often approach saturation, making it harder to distinguish residual differences between methods and identify remaining performance gaps. This study introduces a physically grounded and standardized evaluation framework designed to retain sensitivity beyond conventional global metrics and support both comparison and systematic improvement in tomographic reconstruction methods. Methods: The proposed framework defines standardized reference images—“Source”, “Detector”, “Ideal”, and “Realistic”—using Monte Carlo simulations, with the Ideal Image serving as a physically grounded benchmark. Reconstruction performance is evaluated using pixel-wise difference and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula> maps, Region-of-Interest analysis, intensity (gray-value) histogram comparisons, and the Structure and Contrast Index (SCI), computed on difference maps. Demonstrations use simulated SPECT data reconstructed with ART, MLEM, and RISE-1. Results: Across case studies, SCI and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mi>χ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>-based diagnostics reveal structured residuals and localized deficiencies not evident from global similarity metrics such as SSIM or NMSE. Comparative analyses show that methods with similar global scores can exhibit distinct residual structures and region-specific performance variations, while improved agreement in the sinogram domain does not necessarily translate into improved image fidelity. Histogram-based diagnostics provide complementary information on intensity redistribution not captured by pixel-domain summaries. Conclusions: The framework provides a reproducible, physically meaningful, and sensitive approach for evaluating tomographic reconstruction performance in the high-fidelity regime. By combining standardized reference images with multi-domain and multi-metric analysis, it enables robust benchmarking and supports physically consistent interpretation of reconstruction quality.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →