Tomography · Published 2026-05-25 · DOI 10.3390/tomography12060078
Isaac E. Prentiss, Sasha Hakhu, Jennapher Lingo VanGilder, Parvathy Hareesh, Andrew Hooyman, Jason Yalim, Justin Hines, Gabe LaFond, Edward Ofori, Leslie C. Baxter, Yuxiang Zhou, Leland S. Hu, Kurt G. Schilling, Scott C. Beeman
Background/Objectives: White matter (WM) tract detection is critical in the presurgical planning of tumor resection. However, standard-of-care imaging techniques including T<sub>1</sub>-weighted, T<sub>2</sub>-weighted, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) often fail to identify WM tracts within edematous regions. In T<sub>1</sub>/T<sub>2</sub>-weighted imaging, edema increases extracellular water and reduces tissue contrast, and in diffusion-weighted imaging, edema elevates isotropic diffusion, reducing sensitivity to anisotropic diffusion along WM tracts. Advanced biophysical diffusion modeling techniques such as Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and the Standard Model (SM) address this limitation by compartmentalizing the diffusion signal into free-water, intra-neurite, and extra-neurite contributions. Here, we test if biophysical multi-compartment models can robustly identify WM tracts and recover tractography streamlines within edematous regions. Methods: In this study, we use multi-shell diffusion-weighted MRI data obtained from patients with meningiomas—a pathology allowing for isolation of the effects of edema without the confounding effects of tumor cell invasion. We compared FA from standard and free-water-corrected DTI, the orientation dispersion index (ODI) from NODDI, and P<sub>2</sub> (a scalar descriptor of fiber orientation coherence) from the SM fODF in edematous and unaffected contralateral WM regions. As a proof of concept, we visually evaluated the tractography performance across models. Results: Our results show that (1 − ODI) and P<sub>2</sub> values in edema remained close to within-subject contralateral measurements, contrasting with substantial reductions in FA and FW-FA. (1 − ODI) showed a small but statistically significant increase in edema (~8%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), while P<sub>2</sub> was unchanged. Conclusions: These results highlight the potential of biophysical diffusion models for preoperative mapping in edema.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →
Prentiss, I., Hakhu, S., VanGilder, J., et al. (2026). Biophysical Diffusion MRI Models Better Identify White Matter Tracts in Edema. Tomography. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography12060078