Research map: Interpreting large-scale comparative data in cholecystectomy: Indication bias and design heterogeneity

Back to the article

Papers in this map

  1. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations · Gordon Henry Guyatt · 2008 · 23433 citations · Cited by this paper
  2. From the Editor – in –Chief · Herbert Chen · 2026 · Cites this paper
  3. Outcomes of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy after progression following hepatic cytoreductive operation for neuroendocrine tumors · 2026 · Related
  4. Comparison between open, laparoscopic, and robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis · Felipe Mendes Delpino · 2026 · 5 citations · Cited by this paper
  5. Raised to run faster, not to heal moral injury and the surgeon's capacity to lead · 2026 · Related
  6. Patient-reported outcomes after sutured repair of primary ventral hernias with permanent versus slowly absorbable sutures: a nationwide survey- and register-based study · 2026 · Related
  7. Pressure points: A pilot study using the NASA-TLX tool to measure the intensity of Acute care surgery work · 2026 · Related
  8. Modern academic rite of manuscript submission: Passwords, portals and patience · 2026 · Related
  9. The question of quality in cancer care: How can we make more hospitals 5-star? · 2026 · Related
  10. A call for practice-based research in surgery · 2026 · Related
  11. Digestive robotic surgery in resource-constrained settings: A stress test of surgical systems · 2026 · Related
  12. Robotic versus traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): A dual-phase meta-analysis comparing human and AI-derived evidence · 2026 · Related

Source: OpenAlex (CC0)