Should robotic cholecystectomy not be recommended?

Journal of Visceral Surgery · Published 2026-08-01 · DOI 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2026.07.004

Authors (2)

Karem Slim, Jean-Marc Regimbeau

Abstract

PubPorta does not have an abstract for this article yet.

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year

2026

Citation

Slim, K., Regimbeau, J. (2026). Should robotic cholecystectomy not be recommended?. Journal of Visceral Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2026.07.004

Related articles

• Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Contemporary Practice · JAMA Surgery · 2026 · Cites or is cited by this article
• Laparoscopic enucleation of an endocrine tumor of the pancreatic uncus (with video) · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Intraoperative endoluminal negative airway pressure therapy for esophageal perforation or esophago-gastric anastomotic fistula · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Current understanding and management of brain metastasis from colorectal cancer. A review · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Robotic radical anterogradepancreatosplenectomy (r-RAMPS)(with video) · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Effects of establishing a daytime emergency operating theatre in a university hospital · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2025 · Same journal
• How to manage pelvic-perineal necrotic bacterial dermohypodermitis · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Right ileocoloplasty for the management of caustic esophageal stricture (with video) · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• From bariatric surgery to vascular emergency: A case of primary aorto-duodenal fistula · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal
• Transanal total mesorectal excision versus transabdominal laparoscopic Low Hartmann's procedure for rectal cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes · Journal of Visceral Surgery · 2026 · Same journal