Canadian Geriatrics Journal · Published 2026-06-03 · DOI 10.5770/cgj.29.901
Sarah Maat, Frances Carr, Megan Kennedy, Peggy Chi, Whitney Berta, Adrian Wagg
Background The motivations and attitudes of caregivers strongly influence the care they provide. Motivation is also a central component in staff retention and care consistency, whereas attitude shapes delivery and degree of person-centeredness in care. Although caregiver attitudes and motivations have been examined separ-ately in dementia care research, these constructs have not been comprehensively mapped together within residential memory care settings or explicitly linked to care quality. Objective This review aims to assess literature pertaining to attitudes and motivations of formal caregivers in residential dementia care facilities and to examine how these constructs are associated with care quality. This review seeks to generate practical insights to inform workforce training and recruitment strat-egies to support high-quality, person-centered dementia care. Inclusion Criteria Literature focused on the attitudes and motivations of formally employed caregivers providing care to residents in a residential memory care setting. Studies published of any design, from any year, country, or language will be considered. Method This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method. A comprehensive search will be conducted across major health, social science, and interdisciplinary databases, along with grey literature sources. Data will be extracted according to a JBI template informed by three theoretical frameworks: the Tripartite Model of Attitudes, the Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis, and Person-Centered Care. Results will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Registration Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8yrge
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →
Maat, S., Carr, F., Kennedy, M., et al. (2026). Caregiver Attitudes, Motivations and Care Quality in Residential Memory Care: a Scoping Review Protocol. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.29.901