Obesity Science & Practice · Published 2025-12-01 · DOI 10.1002/osp4.70105
ABSTRACT Background In perioperative settings exercise testing can be used to assess a patient's physical fitness, with VO2max used as a marker to indicate fitness and subsequent risk of adverse surgical outcomes. However, the commonly used reporting methods of VO2max may be problematic in populations with excessive FM such as those awaiting MBS for obesity. Hence, alternative ways of expressing VO2max will be explored. Methods Historical data from individuals presenting for MBS were analyzed. Predicted VO2max values were adjusted relative to the participants measured and “normative” body mass, where each prediction was assigned a classification score. Predicted VO2max adjusted to the participants measured FFM was also considered. Data were compared to individuals that are lean and sedentary as well as those with obesity from a previous study. Results Data from 20 participants awaiting MBS (43.15 ± 11.82 years, 68.50 ± 8.39 cm, 115.29 ± 16.82 kg and 59.93 ± 8.69 kg FFM) were examined. Predicted VO2max relative: to total mass was 20.15 ± 5.00 mL/kg/min; normative body mass was 30.04 ± 6.58 mL/kg/min; and FFM was 38.55 ± 9.08 mL/kg FFM/min. Median fitness classifications increased from very poor to poor when predicted VO2max was expressed relative to normative body mass. Conclusions Reporting predicted VO2max results relative to body mass may be underestimating fitness and overestimating surgical risk in people who are very obese.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →