Role of cyproheptadine in chronic urticaria not controlled with second-generation antihistamines: a retrospective study

Exploration of Immunology · Published 2025-09-21 · DOI 10.37349/ei.2025.1003217

Free full text

Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2025.1003217

Abstract

Aim: This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cyproheptadine versus montelukast as adjuncts to ongoing second-generation antihistamines in adults with refractory chronic urticaria. Methods: This study included adult patients diagnosed with chronic urticaria who did not respond to standard treatment, divided into two groups. Group A received antihistamines plus oral cyproheptadine for one month, and group B received antihistamines in addition to standard-dose montelukast daily (10 mg) for four months. The weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7), chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) scores were measured at the end of grading after four months. Results: After four months, both groups showed significant improvements in UAS7 and CU-Q2oL scores, and group A also saw a notable increase in DLQI score compared to baseline. Group A showed more pronounced improvements overall. Both groups saw a reduction in background antihistamine usage, with group A experiencing a more significant decrease. Additionally, more patients in group A reported daytime sedation and weight gain compared to group B. Conclusions: Cyproheptadine, along with second-generation antihistamines, was found to be efficacious and safe as compared to montelukast along with second-generation antihistamines in patients with chronic urticaria.

Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year
2025

Related articles