SICOT-J · Published 2026-01-01 · DOI 10.1051/sicotj/2026039
Introduction: Despite the growing adoption of teleorthopedics, predominantly targeting low-complexity cases, the cost-minimization potential of this approach remains insufficiently characterized. Methods: The study employed a cost-minimization analysis to compare telemedicine triage against conventional in-person care for orthopedic patients in a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. The analysis focused on cost as the primary outcome, assuming clinical equivalence between interventions. The perspective was hospital-based, considering operational expenses in the emergency department. Data were derived from historical cost records using absorption costing. A decision tree model was developed using TreeAge Pro 2024, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate cost variations. Results adhered to CHEERS guidelines and ISPOR economic reporting standards. Results: The economic analysis revealed an average cost reduction of 48% (US$ 130.00) associated with teleorthopedics, with sensitivity analysis indicating potential 22 savings ranging from 25% (US$ 72.00) to 54% (US$ 146.00). The financial benefit was most pronounced in clinical pathways without diagnostic testing, with a 0.78 probability of cost savings compared to standard care. The consultation duration and telemedicine operational costs are the most influential factors in the cost–benefit outcome. Conclusion: Teleorthopedics demonstrates substantial cost-saving potential, particularly in scenarios without diagnostic testing. Consultation duration and operational costs emerge as key economic drivers.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →