Ethnobotanical evaluation of medicinal flora in Quechua and Aymara communities of the Capachica and Chucuito peninsulas, Lake Titicaca, Peru

Phytomedicine Plus · Published 2026-04-03 · DOI 10.1016/j.phyplu.2026.100985

Free full text

Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phyplu.2026.100985

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Quechua and Aymara communities surrounding Lake Titicaca preserve extensive traditional knowledge of medicinal plants that remains largely undocumented. Understanding this knowledge is essential for recognising its role in local healthcare systems and its potential contribution to pharmacological research. Aim of the study: This study aimed to document the diversity of medicinal plant species, their therapeutic applications, and to evaluate the differences in ethnomedicinal knowledge between the Capachica (Quechua) and Chucuito (Aymara) peninsulas. Materials and methods: Herbarium collections and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 63 informants. Data were classified into 14 disease categories, and reliability was assessed using ethnobotanical indices: use value (UV), fidelity level (FL), informant consensus factor (ICF), and Rahman similarity index (RSI). Results: A total of 146 medicinal species were recorded, 82 shared between both peninsulas. Species knowledge was higher in Capachica (p = 0.02), with no gender difference (p = 0.25). Despite high floristic similarity (Sorensen = 72.81%), therapeutic uses varied (Rahman = 0–20.51), showing cultural differentiation. Twenty-five species had citation frequencies above 70%, notably Dysphania ambrosioides, Ambrosia arborescens, Bidens andicola, and Clinopodium bolivianum. The fidelity level identified Clinopodium bolivianum, Dysphania ambrosioides, and Sonchus oleraceus for digestive disorders; Achyrocline alata and Eucalyptus globulus for respiratory; and Ephedra rupestris for genitourinary conditions. The informant consensus factor exceeded 0.6 in most categories, reflecting strong agreement. Conclusions: Ethnobotanical knowledge remains vital to traditional healthcare among Quechua and Aymara communities. High consensus values and frequent citations of key species confirm their cultural and therapeutic relevance. Pharmacological validation of these plants is essential to integrate traditional practices into contemporary healthcare frameworks.

Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year
2026

Related articles