Diagnostic Value of Stress Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lumbar Canal Stenosis in Patients with Clinico-radiological Mismatch

Indian Spine Journal · Published 2026-01-01 · DOI 10.4103/isj.isj_29_25

Free full text

Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_29_25

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a dynamic condition whose severity can be underestimated on conventional supine magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), especially in patients with a clinico-radiological mismatch between symptoms and imaging findings. Axial loaded MRI (al-MRI) has been proposed to simulate the spine conditions under physiological load, potentially improving the diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, patients with clinically suspected LSS, whose cMRI findings did not fully explain their symptoms, underwent additional al-MRI between L3 and S1. Disk levels were assessed for changes in the grade of central canal stenosis, lateral recess stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and dural sac cross-sectional area (DSA). Results: Out of 237 patients (711-disk levels), significant changes were observed on al-MRI compared to cMRI. Central canal stenosis grade increased from A/B to C/D in 87-disk levels in 73 patients (30.8%). Lateral recess stenosis changed in 33 patients (13.9%) with clear nerve root compression on al-MRI. DSA decreased from >75 mm² to <75 mm² in 93-disk levels (18.1%) in 80 patients (33.8%). Foraminal stenosis grade changed in 178 of 1422 foramina examined, with definite nerve root compression identified in 13 foramina across 11 patients (4.6%). Additionally, occult facet synovial cysts were detected in three patients on al-MRI but not on cMRI. Conclusion: Axial-loaded MRI provides valuable additional diagnostic information in patients with suspected LSS and a clinico-radiological mismatch on conventional MRI. Its routine use in carefully selected cases may enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate management.

Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year
2026

Related articles