Determining the Association Between Hearing Disability and Injury Risk in Older Adults Using Propensity Score Matching: Quasi-Experimental Study

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · Published 2026-03-27 · DOI 10.2196/78826

Free full text

Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.2196/78826

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundWith rapid population aging, both traumatic injuries and hearing disability have become increasingly prevalent among older adults. Hearing disability may increase vulnerability to injury through impaired balance, reduced environmental awareness, and functional limitations; however, longitudinal evidence examining the association between hearing disability and injury risk remains limited. ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between hearing disability and the risk of injury among older adults using a quasi-experimental design with propensity score matching (PSM). MethodsThis population-based cohort study included individuals aged 60 years and older with hearing disabilities and a matched control group without disabilities using data from the National Health Insurance Service–Senior cohort from 2008 to 2019. Injury admission, defined using International Classification of Diseases ResultsThe total number of participants was 43,944, with 10,986 (25%) in the hearing-disabled group and 32,958 (75%) in the nondisabled group, thus confirming a 1:3 matching ratio. The PSM results showed that the standardized mean difference values for all covariates were below the absolute value of 0.1, thus indicating that PSM was successfully performed. The incidence of injury admissions was higher in the hearing-disabled group (1567/10,986, 14.3% of patients) than in the nondisabled group (3966/32,958, 12%), and this difference was statistically significant (PP ConclusionsHearing disability in older adults is independently associated with increased injury admission risk, with greater severity conferring a higher risk and variation by injury site. Interventions such as hearing aid provision, targeted traffic safety measures, and enhanced community and family support are warranted to mitigate this burden.

Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year
2026

Related articles