Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal of Eye Movement Research · Published 2026-07-02 · DOI 10.3390/jemr19040070

Free full text

Authors (7)

Aimy Vadeboncoeur, Chelsey Kwan, Ada Mocanu, Sarah Schipper, Olivia Taylor, Elizabeth Dannenbaum, Joyce Fung

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Many individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) exhibit oculomotor dysfunctions that impact their daily functioning. As current clinical screening tools are limited, we have created and pilot-tested the Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) previously in a small sample of people with acquired brain injuries and neurotypical participants. The current study aims to validate ROSE in persons with TBI, focusing on mild TBI (mTBI). <b>Methods</b>: Participants with TBI (<i>n</i> = 25) completed different clinical scales, including ROSE, Sensory Organization Test (SOT) for standing balance, Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) for mobility, and a visual analogue scale for the subjective perception of visual vertigo. Neurotypical individuals (<i>n</i> = 24) who were age- and sex-matched completed only ROSE. <b>Results</b>: The group with mTBI (<i>n</i> = 18) had significantly higher ROSE scores compared to the neurotypical group, with a large effect size. Significant correlation was found between ROSE and RNLI scores, but not with other clinical outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant between-group difference in ROSE scores and their association with RNLI scores suggest that ROSE is a valid tool in detecting oculomotor dysfunction in TBI. Future studies should continue the validation of ROSE in other TBI and neurologic populations and in larger sample sizes.

Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year
2026

Citation

Vadeboncoeur, A., Kwan, C., Mocanu, A., et al. (2026). Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Eye Movement Research. https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19040070

Related articles