Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology · Published 2026-06-16 · DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2026.101847
Burak Ulkumen, Sabri Mutlu, Onur Celik
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of spreader graft placement during cosmetic rhinoplasty on both objective acoustic measures and subjective voice quality. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, controlled study, volunteers who underwent open structural rhinoplasty by the same surgeon between September 2022 and January 2025 were included. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A (with spreader grafts) and Group B (without spreader grafts). Voice recordings were obtained preoperatively and three months postoperatively in a dedicated voice and speech laboratory. All participants provided informed consent and completed the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) before and after surgery. Objective voice analysis was conducted using the Computerized Speech Lab (CSL) system and Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) software (Kay Elemetrics Corp., Lincoln Park, NJ, USA). Acoustic parameters ‒ fundamental frequency (f0), jitter, jitter percentage, shimmer, shimmer percentage, and Noise-to-Harmonics Ratio (NHR) ‒ were measured from sustained /a/ phonations. Spectrographic analysis assessed formant frequencies (F1–F4) during production of nasal consonants (/m/, /n/) and the nasalized vowel /i/ in the word mini. Results: In Group A, significant postoperative differences were observed only in F3 and F4 formant values for /m/. In Group B, significant changes were detected in shimmer (dB), jitter, and formant values (F2, F3, F4 for /n/ and F3, F4 for /m/). Postoperative group comparison revealed significant differences in F4 for /m/, F3 for /n/, and F3 for the nasalized vowel /i/. Regarding subjective measures, VHI-10 scores significantly increased postoperatively only in Group B. Preoperative VHI-10 scores did not differ significantly between groups, while postoperative scores showed significant differences. Conclusion: Cosmetic rhinoplasty may affect voice parameters, particularly formants F3 and F4, essential components of the singer’s and actor’s formant cluster. Spreader grafts appear to preserve these frequencies, suggesting their importance in patients who professionally rely on voice quality. Level of evidence: According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, this study qualifies as Level 1b evidence, as it is a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →
Ulkumen, B., Mutlu, S., Celik, O. (2026). The effect of spreader graft use on voice in rhinoplasty cases: a prospective randomized controlled study. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2026.101847