Scaling back aid for Africa is a strategic misstep for the United States
Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · Published 2025-07-08 · DOI 10.1080/23779497.2025.2529165
Free full text
Authors being retrieved — see the publisher record. https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2025.2529165
Abstract
Policy shifts in US foreign aid under the Trump administration have had far-reaching consequences for global health, particularly on the African continent. The withdrawal from the World Health Organization and the suspension of foreign aid have significantly disrupted US global health initiatives. While programmes such as PEPFAR have retained some support, the shutdown on USAID operations – a critical agency for health and disease response across 47 sub-Saharan African countries – poses substantial challenges. These cutbacks not only threaten public health efforts but also diminish strategic investment opportunities, given Africa’s rapidly growing economies and potential for high economic returns. Furthermore, reducing aid endangers healthcare and biomedical innovations that have been instrumental in combating diseases such as Ebola and HIV. In the past, US-funded initiatives have contributed to Africa’s pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity and technological advancements, fostering mutual economic benefits. The shift in foreign aid policy risks weakening US global influence, creating a vacuum that geopolitical competitors, such as China and Russia, are poised to exploit. In this paper, we argue that sustained investment in African health initiatives is essential for strengthening economic partnerships, enhancing global health security, and reinforcing US geopolitical standing.
Abstract from DOAJ. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Read the article at the publisher →
Publication details
- Year
- 2025
Related articles
- Biotechnology and Biodefense Enterprise: An Industry Perspective on Defence Acquisition · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2022 · Same journal
- Regional approach to strengthening biosafety and biosecurity systems in Africa · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2023 · Same journal
- Understanding and progressing health system decentralisation in Myanmar · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2020 · Same journal
- Epidemiological trends of leishmaniasis in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador (2015–2021): implications for public health surveillance · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2026 · Same journal
- How virtual relationality enables the incel collective, its narrative and violence · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2024 · Same journal
- Jordan experience in combating coronavirus: a descriptive analytical study of defense orders (2020–2022) · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2026 · Same journal
- Laboratory capacity in COVID-19 diagnosis and the need to enhance molecular testing in Ghana · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2021 · Same journal
- A comparative analysis of two food security and nutrition policies in Yemen between 2018 and 2023: agricultural livelihoods and multisectoral nutrition plan · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2025 · Same journal
- Suppressed swimming activity in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to 1,4,5-oxadithiepane, a sulphur mustard degradation product · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2017 · Same journal
- Government healthcare spending in times of economic sanctions · Global Security - Health, Science and Policy · 2024 · Same journal