Rationing without a rule: Legitimacy and the case for primary legislation in pandemic critical care

Clinical Ethics · Published 2026-07-18 · DOI 10.1177/14777509261469481

Authors (1)

Larry Mulleague

Abstract

PubPorta does not have an abstract for this article yet.

Read the article at the publisher →

Publication details

Year

2026

Citation

Mulleague, L. (2026). Rationing without a rule: Legitimacy and the case for primary legislation in pandemic critical care. Clinical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509261469481

Related articles

• Minding the epistemic gap: Uncertain moral status, precautionary practical ethics and the problem of reasoning from the problem of other minds · Clinical Ethics · 2025 · Same journal
• Chemo sickness as existential feeling: A conceptual contribution to person-centered phenomenological oncology care · Clinical Ethics · 2023 · Same journal
• From a phenomenology of birth towards an ethics of obstetric care · Clinical Ethics · 2024 · Same journal
• Caregiving and role conflict distress · Clinical Ethics · 2023 · Same journal
• The child's right to bodily integrity and autonomy: A conceptual analysis · Clinical Ethics · 2023 · Same journal
• Fixing bodies and shaping narratives: Epistemic injustice and the responses of medicine and bioethics to intersex human rights demands · Clinical Ethics · 2023 · Same journal
• Avoiding paternalism in medical interpretation for informed consent for deaf patients: Incorporating respect and relational autonomy · Clinical Ethics · 2025 · Same journal
• The need for Hispanic cultural competency in drug abuse treatment training programs: An empirical and ethical evaluation of US universities · Clinical Ethics · 2024 · Same journal
• Moral precaution and the limits of knowledge: A reply to Coggon · Clinical Ethics · 2025 · Same journal
• Roadblocks to reforming UK guidelines on medically unnecessary penile circumcision: inconsistent safeguarding of bodily integrity · Clinical Ethics · 2023 · Same journal